- Small but bright console
- Decent accuracy for the price
- Somewhat complicated setup
- Not as well constructed as other models
Date of our Original Review: June 2024
Ambient Weather has long been recognized for producing accurate weather stations that integrate well with smart home technology at competitive prices. The Ambient Weather WS-1965 is the company’s latest base model, designed to replace the WS-1900, which lacked internet connectivity. That was a real problem for the WS-1900, which cheaper AcuRite models have had for several years.
The WS-1965 aims to compete with budget models from brands like Sainlogic and AcuRite, which offer internet connectivity at around the $100 mark. Despite some compromises in the sensor suite and console features, this model could be a viable option for entry-level weather enthusiasts.
We were excited to test this station out as the sensor suite appears in several Ecowitt models which are available internationally. But this review focuses on Ambient Weather and the WS-1965, so we’ll stay there.
What’s Included
In the box, you will find the sensor suite, mounting hardware, and a small screwdriver for attaching the wind gauge and anemometer. The console display is compact (approximately 4” x 4” and an inch thick) but remains bright and readable from a distance. Additional items include a manual, power cable, and plug for the console, along with four ‘AA’ batteries (two for the console as backup power and two for the sensor suite).
Installation Experience
Setting up the WS-1965 is similar to other Ambient Weather stations. The sensor suite requires minimal assembly, and the included wire coil for the rain gauge is a thoughtful touch to prevent debris buildup. However, I encountered a loose screw within the sensor suite, a first for me with Ambient Weather products. Despite this, the sensor suite functioned correctly once assembled.
The Wi-Fi setup process is less straightforward than other models, requiring a direct connection to the console to alter settings. This could pose challenges for those less technically inclined. Updating the console firmware is crucial to avoid issues with forecast accuracy. Ambient Weather’s manual provides detailed instructions to guide users through the process.
Performance and Accuracy
The WS-1965 offers standard weather data, excluding UV and light sensors present in higher-end models like the WS-2902 and WS-5000. While these exclusions limit some smart home integrations, core functions such as indoor and outdoor temperature, humidity, wind speed, rainfall, and barometric pressure are well-supported.
Comparing the WS-1965 to the KestrelMet 6000, I found temperature readings to be slightly cooler, with discrepancies of up to a degree during peak sunlight hours. This was unexpected, as non-aspirated sensors typically read warmer in direct sunlight. Humidity readings were accurate, though slightly higher in drier conditions. The rain gauge performed reliably, measuring 1.01” of rain compared to the KestrelMet’s 1.00”.
The barometer, though not calibrated for this review, operated within an acceptable range, albeit with a slightly larger margin of error than preferred. For precise weather tracking, the WS-2902 remains a superior choice due to its enhanced sensor suite.
Ambient Weather Network (AWN) Enhancements
Ambient Weather has introduced a new fee-based tier to its AWN platform. The free level offers map layers, notifications, forecasts, and a one-year data history. The $50 annual subscription adds additional map layers, text alerts, a three-year data history, and extended forecasts up to 10 days, thanks to a partnership with Vaisala Weather. Despite this, AccuWeather map data is notably absent.
The AWN platform’s data retention policy remains unclear. Unlike Davis, which retains user data beyond subscription periods, it is uncertain if AWN maintains weather data past a year without an active subscription. Sharing data with Weather Underground is a viable alternative for long-term data storage.
Conclusion
The Ambient Weather WS-1965 is a commendable entry-level weather station, albeit with some compromises in build and sensor quality. While it is preferable over similarly priced models from other brands, the WS-2902 remains the better choice for serious weather enthusiasts due to its superior accuracy and feature set. If budget permits, opting for the WS-2902 is advisable. In a pinch, the WS-1965 still outperforms other budget options.
